Levi Strauss & Co. v. TOYO ENTERPRISE CO., LTD.

Good Law
665 F. Supp. 2d 1084·2009 WL 3353097·2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96534
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 19, 2009C 07-0245 PJHCalifornia4,925 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hamilton, J.

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, AND GRANTING MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT

The court has reviewed Magistrate Judge Maria Elena James’ report and recommendation re plaintiff Levi Strauss & Co.’s request for entry of default judgment. Defendants filed no objections to the report. The court finds the report correct, well-reasoned and thorough, and adopts it in every respect. Accordingly, the motion for default judgment is GRANTED on each of plaintiffs claims against defendants.

Defendants Samurai Co., Ltd.; Studio D’Artisan International Co., Ltd.; Full Count Co.; and John Bull Co., Ltd., their agents, employees, attorneys, successors, assigns, affiliates, and joint venturers and any person or persons in active concert or participation with any of them, and/or any person or persons acting for, with, by, through or under any of them are permanently enjoined from:

IT IS SO ORDERED.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION RE PLAINTIFF LEVI STRAUSS & CO.’S REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT [Dkt. # 47]

I. INTRODUCTION

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Levi Strauss & Co.’s Request for Entry of Default Judgment (“the Motion”) against Defendants Samurai Co., Ltd.; Studio D’Artisan…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.