In Re Immune Response Securities Litigation

Good Law
375 F. Supp. 2d 983·2005 WL 1579484·2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12602
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 7, 200501CV1237JWMCCalifornia20,676 words

Opinion

Opinion

Jones, J.

ORDER: (1) DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS THE COMPLAINT; AND (2) DENYING DEFENDANTS’ REQUESTS FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE

This is a class action on behalf of all persons (“Plaintiffs”) who bought shares of Immune Response Corporation (“IRC”) between May 17, 1999 and July 6, 2001 (the “Class Period”). (Comply 1.) Plaintiffs allege IRC and its representatives made false and misleading statements about the efficacy of REMUNE — a drug IRC developed for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (“HIV”). Specifically, Plaintiffs allege securities fraud under the 1933 Securities Exchange Act §§ 11, 12(a)(2), and 15, as well as, Securities Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Rule 10b-5 and §§ 10(b), 20(a) of the 1934 Act. Defendants now move to dismiss under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) and 9(b). Plaintiffs oppose the Motions. For the reasons set forth below, Defendants’ Motions are DENIED.

Request for Judicial Notice

Defendants request incorporation by reference and judicial notice of various documents, some of which Plaintiffs oppose. As set forth below, the Court DENIES Defendants’ requests.

“As a general rule, a district court may not consider any material beyond the pleadings in ruling on a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.