McCoy

People v. McCoy

Bad Law
108 Cal. Rptr. 2d 188·2001 Cal. LEXIS 3791·2001 Daily Journal DAR 6513·25 Cal. 4th 1111·24 P.3d 1210
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJune 25, 2001S087893California4,338 words

Opinion

Opinion

Chin, J.

We granted review to decide whether an aider and abettor may be guilty of greater homicide-related offenses than those the actual perpetrator committed. Because defenses or extenuating circumstances may exist that are personal to the actual perpetrator and do not apply to the aider and abettor, the answer, sometimes, is yes. We reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeal, which concluded otherwise.

I. Factual and Procedural History

Codefendants Ejaan Dupree McCoy and Derrick Lakey were tried together and convicted of crimes arising out of a drive-by shooting in Stockton in 1995. McCoy drove the car and Lakey was in the front passenger seat, with others in the back. The car approached four people standing on a street comer. McCoy leaned out of the window and shouted something. A flurry of shots was fired from the car toward the group. Witnesses saw both McCoy and Lakey shooting handguns. Two of the group were shot, one fatally. The other two escaped injury. Someone from outside the car returned fire, wounding Lakey. The evidence showed that McCoy fired the fatal bullets.

At trial, McCoy but not Lakey testified. McCoy admitted shooting but claimed he did so because he…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.