Ansell

People v. Ansell

Bad Law
108 Cal. Rptr. 2d 145·2001 Cal. LEXIS 3759·2001 Daily Journal DAR 5997·25 Cal. 4th 868·24 P.3d 1174
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJune 14, 2001S079744California11,144 words

Opinion

Opinion

Baxter, J.

The Legislature has provided more than one means by which, after the sentence is served, a convicted felon may ask the Governor for a pardon, and may thereby seek release from certain civil disabilities attending the conviction. One such statutory procedure appears in Penal Code section 4852.01 et seq., concerning “certificates of rehabilitation” in the superior court. A convicted felon can request a certificate of rehabilitation, and the superior court may issue such an order, upon a compelling showing of postsentence reform. If granted, the certificate of rehabilitation serves as an automatic application and judicial recommendation for a gubernatorial pardon in the particular case.

Samuel Earl Ansell, Jr., (Ansell) is a convicted child molester who sought a certificate of rehabilitation long after he finished serving his sentence. The superior court denied the petition under a statutory amendment, adopted after Ansell committed his crimes, which makes a certificate of rehabilitation unavailable to persons who, like Ansell, have been convicted of particular sex offenses. The Court of Appeal affirmed. Ansell sought review in this court.

Ansell claims here, as below,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.