Estate of Griswold

Good Law
108 Cal. Rptr. 2d 165·25 Cal. 4th 904·24 P.3d 1191
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJune 21, 2001S087881California9,006 words

Opinion

Opinion

Kitchen & Turpin, David C. Turpin, Santa Barbara, Law Office of Herb Fox and Herb Fox, Santa Barbara, for Objector and Appellant.

Mullen & Henzell and Lawrence T. Sorensen, Santa Barbara, for Petitioner and Respondent.

BAXTER, J.

Section 6452 of the Probate Code (all statutory references are to this code unless otherwise indicated) bars a "natural parent" or a relative of that parent from inheriting through a child born out of wedlock on the basis of the parent and child relationship unless the parent or relative "acknowledged the child" and "contributed to the support or the care of the child." In this case, we must determine whether section 6452 precludes the half siblings of a child born out of wedlock from sharing in the child's intestate estate where the record is undisputed that their father appeared in an Ohio court, admitted paternity of the child, and paid court-ordered child support until the child was 18 years old. Although the father and the out-of-wedlock child apparently never met or communicated, and the half siblings did not learn of the child's existence until after both the child and the father died, there is no indication that the father ever denied paternity…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.