Club Members for an Honest Election v. Sierra Club

Good Law
2008 Cal. LEXIS 13720·45 Cal. 4th 309·86 Cal. Rptr. 3d 288·196 P.3d 1094·37 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1001
Supreme Court of CaliforniaDecember 15, 2008S143087California3,788 words

Opinion

Opinion

Corrigan, J.

Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16, commonly referred to as the anti-SLAPP statute, provides that a civil cause of action may be dismissed as a strategic lawsuit against public participation (SLAPP). Section 425.17, subdivision (b) (section 425.17(b)) provides an exception to the anti-SLAPP statute by exempting some actions from dismissal. Here, we hold the exception applies only when the entire action is brought in the public interest. If any part of the complaint seeks relief to directly benefit the plaintiff, by securing relief greater than or different from that sought on behalf of the general public, the section 425.17(b) exception does not apply.

Accordingly, we reverse a contrary judgment by the Court of Appeal. However, we affirm that part of the judgment holding that the trial court properly struck parts of the complaint under the anti-SLAPP statute because its order established that plaintiffs did not show a probability of prevailing.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The Sierra Club (Club), the nation’s largest environmental organization, is governed by a 15-member board of directors (Board), who are elected for three-year staggered terms. The Club holds…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.