Tele Atlas N v. v. NAVTEQ Corp.

Good Law
397 F. Supp. 2d 1184·2005 WL 2893782·2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29957
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 2, 2005C-05-01673 RMWCalifornia4,699 words

Opinion

Opinion

Whyte, J.

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS

[Re Docket No. 24]

Plaintiffs Tele Atlas N.V. and Tele Atlas North America (“Tele Atlas”) have sued defendant NAVTEQ Corporation (“NAV-TEQ”) for (1) violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1-2 , (2) violation of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 14 , (3) violation of California Business and Professions Code §§ 16720, 16726, 16727, and 17200, (4) intentional interference with contractual relations, and (5) intentional interference with prospective economic advantage. NAVTEQ moves to dismiss Tele Atlas’ first amended complaint (“FAC”). The court has read the moving and responding papers and considered the arguments of counsel. For the reasons set forth below, the court grants in part and denies in part NAVTEQ’s motion.

I. BACKGROUND

Tele Atlas and NAVTEQ license digital map data to makers of navigation devices. FAC ¶ 1. According to Tele Atlas, Etak, Inc. (“Etak”) introduced the first consumer navigation system in 1985. Id. at ¶ 29. Etak and NAVTEQ were competitors for about ten years. Id. at ¶ 30. In 1996, Sony Corporation of America (“Sony”) bought Etak. Id. at ¶ 31. Tele Atlas contends that Sony…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.