Gill

Federal Trade Commission v. Gill

Good Law
71 F. Supp. 2d 1030·1999 WL 1044383·1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20610
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 3, 1999CV98-1436LGBMCXCalifornia10,208 words

Opinion

Opinion

Baird, J.

ORDER GRANTING FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

I. INTRODUCTION

Defendants run a service that advertises that it can remove “negative information” from credit reports. The FTC brings the instant suit against defendants under (1) the Credit Repair Organization Act for defendants’ allegedly misleading statements and illegal billing practices and (2) the FTC Act for deceptive practices.

II. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

A. THE PARTIES

Defendant Gill is a licensed attorney who does business as a sole practitioner as the Law Offices of Keith Gill. See FTC’s Statement of Uncontroverted Facts at 3 (“FTC’s Statement”). In addition to a general law practice, Gill has offered credit repair services to consumers since 1995. See id. Defendant Murkey is a retired attorney. See id. at 7. Since 1995, in conjunction with Gill’s office, Murkey has offered credit repair services to consumers. See id. at 3.

B. THE REPRESENTATIONS

Through the use of radio broadcasts, ads in various newspapers, and phone conversations and personal meetings, the FTC alleges that defendants “prey on consumers with bad credit histories” by offering them a free initial consultation and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.