Katherine G. Ex Rel. Cynthia G. v. Kentfield School District

Good Law
261 F. Supp. 2d 1159·2003 WL 21196504·2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8570
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 7, 2003C 01-1344 SBACalifornia19,989 words

Opinion

Opinion

Armstrong, J.

ORDER ADJUDICATING PARTIES’ MOTIONS AND CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Plaintiff Katherine G. (“Plaintiff’ or “Katherine”), by and through her guardian ad litem, Cynthia G., brings the instant action pursuant to the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (the “IDEA”), 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq., against the Kent-field School District and the Marin County Office of Education (collectively, “Defendants” or the “District”), seeking review of portions of a special education administrative hearing decision. The District has filed a counterclaim against Katherine also pursuant to the IDEA, seeking review of different portions of the decision.

The parties are presently before the Court on Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (“Plaintiffs Motion”) and Defendants’ Cross-motion for Summary Judgment on Plaintiffs Claim (“Defendants’ Cross-motion”), which relate to Katherine’s claim against the District, and on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment on Their Counterclaim (“Defendants’ Motion”) and Plaintiffs Cross-motion for Summary Judgment (“Plaintiffs Cross-motion”), which relate to the District’s counterclaim against Katherine. Having read and considered the- papers submitted…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.