Dougherty
Dougherty v. Golden Gate Bridge
Opinion
Opinion
Armstrong, J.
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff brought this action for injuries allegedly sustained while she was employed by defendant Golden Gate Bridge, Highway and Transportation District. Plaintiff filed her complaint under the Jones Act, 46 U.S.C.App. § 688, and general admiralty law, asserting that her injuries were caused by defendant’s negligence and the unseaworthiness of defendant’s sea vessels.
Defendant now moves for summary judgment arguing that plaintiffs claims are precluded by the California Torts Claim Act (“CTCA”), through which defendant contends that it enjoys sovereign immunity. Defendant does not claim Eleventh Amendment immunity; rather, it claims a different type of immunity — immunity conferred by the state. It asserts that it did not waive its immunity under the CTCA in this ease, as plaintiff failed to file notice of her claim with defendant as required by the CTCA.
In addition, defendant asserts that plaintiffs unseaworthiness claim should be summarily adjudicated because it is a nonstatuto-ry cause of action premised on strict liability and, as such, it is not…