Environmental Protection Information Center v. Pacific Lumber Co.

Good Law
266 F. Supp. 2d 1101·2003 WL 21349936·57 ERC (BNA) 1188·2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9645
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 6, 2003C 01-2821 MHPCalifornia10,976 words

Opinion

Opinion

Patel, J.

Motions to Dismiss

Plaintiff Environmental Protection Information Center (“EPIC”), a non-profit environmental organization in Humboldt County, California, brings this action on behalf of itself and its members against Pacific Lumber Company and Scotia Pacific Lumber Company (collectively “PAL-CO”), the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”), and Christine Todd Whitman as EPA Administrator. Pursuant to state law and the Clean Water Act (“CWA”), 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq., EPIC seeks declaratory and injunctive relief, civil penalties, and restitution for PALCO’s alleged discharge of pollutants into Bear Creek in Humboldt County. EPIC also challenges an EPA regulation that allegedly excludes PALCO’s actions from permitting required by the CWA. Now before the court are separate motions to dismiss by PALCO and EPA. After having considered the parties’ arguments, and for the reasons stated herein, the court rules as follows. BACKGROUND

I. Factual Background

At the heart of this action is the Bear Creek watershed, covering 5500 acres of land in Humboldt County, California. Bear Creek, a tributary of the lower Eel River, is located several miles upstream of Scotia, California.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.