Brady

Brady v. Attygala

Good Law
196 F. Supp. 2d 1016·2002 WL 655500·2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7748
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 17, 2002CV 01-4549-CAS (SGL)California3,657 words

Opinion

Opinion

Larson, J.

AMENDED ORDER RE: EXHAUSTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES

Charles W. Brady has filed a civil rights complaint against various prison officials, claiming that while he was incarcerated at Lancaster State Prison correctional officers allowed another inmate to injure him and that prison doctors were deliberately indifferent to his medical needs in how they treated a laceration under his right eye he suffered during the fight with the other inmate. Defendants have asserted that, despite representations in his complaint, Brady failed to exhaust the administrative remedies provided by the California Department of Corrections prior to filing this action.

BACKGROUND

Brady alleges in his complaint that on May 3, 1999, he informed prison officials that he did not want to have Darren Coleman as his cell mate because Coleman was a “gang member”; it turns out that Coleman and Brady did not get along on account of Coleman being a Muslim. (Compl. Ex. A at 2; Am. Compl. ¶ 1). On May 7, 1999, while directing inmates back to their respective cells after the morning meal, Correctional Officer Peter Rembulat observed Coleman standing in front of another inmate’s cell. (Compl. Ex. A at 1). Officer…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.