Snowney

Snowney v. Harrah's Entertainment, Inc.

Caution
2005 Cal. LEXIS 5892·2005 Daily Journal DAR 6517·29 Cal. Rptr. 3d 33·35 Cal. 4th 1054·112 P.3d 28
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJune 6, 2005S124286California5,527 words

Opinion

Opinion

Brown, J.

In this case, a California resident filed a class action against a group of Nevada hotels for failing to provide notice of an energy surcharge imposed on hotel guests. Although these hotels conduct no business and have no bank accounts or employees in California, they do advertise heavily in California and obtain a significant percentage of their business from California residents. These advertising activities include billboards located in California, print ads in California newspapers, and ads aired on California radio and television stations. These hotels also maintain an Internet Web site and toll-free phone number where visitors or callers may obtain room quotes and make reservations. We now consider whether, based on these activities, California courts may exercise personal jurisdiction over these hotels, and conclude that they may.

I.

Defendants Harrah’s Las Vegas, Inc., Harrah’s Laughlin, Inc., Harrah’s Operating Company, Inc. (HOC), Rio Properties, Inc., and Harveys Tahoe Management Company, Inc. (collectively defendants), own and operate hotels in Nevada. Plaintiff Frank Snowney is a California resident. In 2001, plaintiff reserved a room by phone from his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.