Hoffman

Hoffman v. Capital Cities/ABC, Inc.

Good Law
33 F. Supp. 2d 867·1999 WL 38490·27 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1527·50 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1195·1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 506
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 22, 1999CV 97-3638 DT (Mcx)California4,251 words

Opinion

Opinion

Tevrizian, J.

COURT’S MEMORANDUM OF DECISION, FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

I

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

The above action came on regularly for trial on January 12, 13, 14 and 15, 1999.

Greenberg Glusker Fields Claman & Ma-chtinger, LLP by Charles N. Sheppard, Esq. and Aaron J. Moss, Esq., appeared for Plaintiff, Dustin Hoffman.

Munger, Tolies & Olson, LLP by Steven M. Perry, Esq. and Steven B. Weisburd, Esq., appeared for Defendants, Los Angeles Magazine, Inc. and ABC, Inc. (formerly known as Capital Cities/ABC, Inc.).

Evidence was presented to the Court sitting without a jury. Oral argument made on behalf of the respective parties was presented and considered by the Court. The Court, now feeling fully advised, rules as follows:

II

FINDINGS OF FACT

Plaintiff, Dustin Hoffman, is a highly successful and recognizable motion picture actor. For the past thirty years he has appeared in scores of motion pictures and has received numerous honors, including six Academy Award nominations and two Academy Awards. He has also been nominated and has been awarded a Golden Globe Award and an Emmy Award for his work. It can be said that Mr. Hoffman is truly one our country’s living treasures,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.