Henry M. Griffith v. B. J. Rhay, as Superintendent of the Washington State Penitentiary at Walla Walla, Washington

Good Law
282 F.2d 711·1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 3737
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 12, 196016705California3,817 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hamley, J.

Henry M. Griffith appeals from a district court order denying his application for a writ of habeas corpus. He is in the custody of the warden of Washington State Penitentiary under a death sentence following his conviction in the state court on a charge of murder in the first degree. The opinion of the district court is reported in 177 F.Supp. 386 .

Griffith argues here that the district court erred in rejecting his contention that he was deprived of due process of law in the state trial court proceedings. Specifically, it is urged that the trial court should not have received in evidence a signed confession obtained while Griffith was assertedly under the influence of drugs, and while he was without the assistance of counsel. Question is also raised concerning the manner in which the jury was required to function in evaluating the weight to.be accorded this confession and testimony relative to certain oral admissions.

Griffith has not raised this latter question in any state court proceeding. Since he has failed to exhaust his state court remedies the district court and this court are without jurisdiction to grant relief on that ground, however meritorious it may be. See 28…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.