ROETTGEN

ROETTGEN v. Ryan

Good Law
639 F. Supp. 2d 1053·2009 WL 1929261·2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 56119
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 30, 2009Case CV 05-6554 R(JC)California10,629 words

Opinion

Opinion

Real, J.

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 , the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody (the “Petition”), all of the records herein, and the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. The Court approves and adopts the United States Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation.

IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order, the United States Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, and the Judgment herein on petitioner and counsel for respondent.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

This Report and Recommendation is submitted to the Honorable Manuel L. Real, United States District Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636 and General Order 05-07 of the United States District Court for the Central District of California.

I. SUMMARY

On September 6, 2005, John Roettgen (“petitioner”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a Petition for Writ…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.