Arriaga

Arriaga v. Cross Country Bank

Good Law
163 F. Supp. 2d 1189·2001 WL 1035316·2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11126
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 5, 200101 0498 IEG (RBB)California7,085 words

Opinion

Opinion

Gonzalez, J.

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND STAY PROCEEDINGS

Presently before the Court is a motion to compel arbitration and stay the action pending arbitration by defendants Cross Country Bank and Applied Card Systems, Inc. (collectively the “defendants”). For the reasons discussed below, the Court grants defendants’ motion to compel arbitration on all claims and stays the action pending arbitration.

BACKGROUND

On March 21, 2001, plaintiff Andrea Ar-riaga (“Arriaga”) initiated this class action on behalf of herself and similarly situated individuals against defendants Cross Country Bank (“CCB”) and Applied Card Systems, Incorporated (“ACS”). Arriaga claims that defendants violated the Truth in Lending Act (TILA), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1632 , 1637, the Consumer Legal Remedies Act (CLRA), California Civil Code § 1750, and California Business and Professions Code § 17200, as well as engaged in fraud and breach of contract. All claims relate to her CCB credit card account maintained by CCB and ACS collectively. (See Compl. at ¶ 17.)

Arriaga alleges that in the summer of 1999 she received a mailer encouraging her to accept a Cross Country credit card as a way to establish…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.