Rice

Rice v. Clark

Good Law
120 Cal. Rptr. 2d 522·2002 Cal. LEXIS 3774·2002 Daily Journal DAR 6391·28 Cal. 4th 89·47 P.3d 300
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJune 10, 2002S097456California6,334 words

Opinion

Opinion

Werdegar, J.

Probate Code section 21350 presumptively disqualifies, as the recipient of a donative transfer by instrument, a person who drafts the instrument {id., subd. (a)(1)) or who, having a fiduciary relationship with the transferor, “transcribes the instrument or causes it to be transcribed” (id., subd. (a)(4)). The issue presented in this case is whether the class of persons disqualified because they cause an instrument to be transcribed is broad enough to include a person who provides information needed in the instrument’s preparation and who encourages the donor to execute it, but who does not direct or otherwise participate in the instrument’s transcription to final written form. Like the trial and appellate courts below, we conclude the category of persons disqualified under section 21350, subdivision (a)(4) is not so broad.

Factual and Procedural Background

Petitioner Owen S. Rice seeks to invalidate gifts decedent Cecilia M. Clare made by will, trust and other instruments that left Clare’s entire estate to respondent Richard L. Clark (Clark) and his wife, respondent Janet A. Clark. Because the trust instrument names Rice as the contingent beneficiary if the Clarks…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.