Catherine C. Stark v. Arthur S. Flemming, Secretary of the Department of Health, Education and Welfare of the United States
Opinion
Opinion
We hold Flemming v. Lindgren, 9 Cir., 275 F.2d 596 , applicable here and that a similar result should be reached.
Appellant placed her assets — a farm, and a duplex house — in a newly organized corporation. Then she began to draw $400 per month as salary. The Secretary has found the corporation was a. sham. There is no doubt that the corporation was set up to qualify appellant, in a short time for social security payments.
But here there seems to have been' proper adherence to the normal corporate-routines. And it is difficult to understand how the corporate arrangement would not have to be respected by others than the Secretary. And we think he-must respect it, too.
Congress could have provided that the motivation to obtain social security by organizing a corporation would defeat the end. It did not.
The Secretary is justified in taking exception to the amount paid Mrs. Stark for her services by which she sought to.qualify herself for the maximum amount of social security payments. The salary left little or nothing for a return on, capital, and the capital was substantial.
So we think the Secretary is entitled' to make an objective reappraisal of the-salary to determine what…