McSHAN v. SHERRILL

Good Law
283 F.2d 462·3 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 141·1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 3481
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 26, 196016538California1,710 words

Opinion

Opinion

283 F.2d 462 Frank B. McSHAN, Maggie L. McShan, Clesson W. Kerr and Leona W. Kerr, Appellants, v. Charles B. SHERRILL, Mary Y. Sherrill, William L. LaFollette and Susanne H. LaFollette, Appellees. No. 16538. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. October 26, 1960. Shute & Elsing, W. T. Elsing, Lewis, Roca, Scoville, Beauchamp & Linton, John P. Frank, Phoenix, Ariz., for appellants. Cunningham, Carson & Messinger, William H. Rehnquist, Phoenix, Ariz., for appellees. Before POPE, MAGRUDER and KOELSCH, Circuit Judges. MAGRUDER, Circuit Judge. 1 Appellees own land which at one time bordered on the east bank of the Colorado River. The river has since shifted to the west, and appellees claim the land now lying between their property and the present river bed on the basis of accretion. Appellants dispute that claim; and they have attempted to prove that the change in the river bed was perceptible and sudden, it having been agreed that accretion occurs only upon a gradual and imperceptible shifting of a river. See State of Oklahoma v. State of Texas, 1923, 260 U.S. 606 , 43 S.Ct. 221 , 67 L.Ed. 428 ; State of Nebraska v. State of Iowa, 1892, 143 U.S. 359 , 12 S.Ct. 396

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.