Duvall

Duvall v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance

Good Law
646 F. Supp. 2d 1188·2009 WL 2488179·2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74053
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 13, 2009CIV. S-08-651 LKK/GGHCalifornia9,246 words

Opinion

Opinion

Karlton, J.

ORDER

Plaintiff has brought suit under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) seeking review of the insurance claim administrator’s determination of her entitlement to benefits. The parties have cross-moved for judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52. The court resolves the motion on the papers and after oral argument. For the reasons stated herein, the court grants defendant’s motion and denies plaintiffs.

I. FACTS

A. Defendant’s Long-Term Disability Plan

Plaintiff was a registered nurse employed by Marshall Medical Center and insured through her employer for group disability coverage by defendant. ICR at 234-35, 238. Among other things, the plan provided income replacement for eligible persons upon “total disability from sickness or injury.” Id. at 238. “Total disability” is given a specific definition in the plan. First, it only encompasses disability arising from “injury or sickness.” Id. at 246. Where a total disability is “caused by or contributed to by mental or nervous disorders,” the claimant is only entitled to benefits for twenty-four months, unless the claimant is in a hospital or institution at the end of that time. Id. at 257. These include…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.