Agile Software Corp. v. Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.

Good Law
174 F. Supp. 2d 1032·2001 WL 1486189·2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19739
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 15, 2001C 01-01406 WHACalifornia2,527 words

Opinion

Opinion

Alsup, J.

ORDER DISMISSING CASE

INTRODUCTION

This action presents an issue of first impression, namely who bears the costs of providing shareholder materials for securities held in a so-called HOLDRS trust. This order holds that the issuer bears those costs under properly-promulgated regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. This order DISMISSES plaintiffs’ complaint as to the federal claim and declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state-law claims.

STATEMENT

Defendant Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fen-ner & Smith, Inc., began offering a product called HOLDRS (holding company depository receipts) in 1999. Merrill Lynch created HOLDRS by selecting several companies within an industry or a sector, buying their stock, and then placing the stock in a trust held by defendant Bank of New York. HOLDRS were receipts to the trust, representing each purchaser’s interest in the underlying shares. Investors could'trade HOLDRS as securities on defendant American Stock Exchange (“AMEX”).

Approval from the SEC was necessary-before HOLDRS could be sold. On May 28, 1999, AMEX filed a rule change with the SEC, seeking permission to amend AMEX Rules 1200 through 1202 to allow…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.