Dumas

Dumas v. Major League Baseball Properties, Inc.

Bad Law
52 F. Supp. 2d 1183·1999 WL 398039·1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9014
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 14, 199998 CV 1772-B(AJB), 98 CV 2121-B (AJB)California5,936 words

Opinion

Opinion

Brewster, J.

ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO STAY CASE PURSUANT TO THE FIRST-TO-FILE RULE; DENYING MOTIONS TO TRANSFER PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1404 (a); DENYING MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE

I. Introduction

This Order encompasses three motions bearing on five different cases. First, the League and Player Licensor Defendants in Dumas et al. v. Major League Baseball Properties, et al. (“Dumas ”), case no. 98 CV 1772-B (AJB), and Defendant The Topps Company, Inc. (“Topps”) in Rodriquez et al. v. The Topps Company (“Rodriquez ”), case no. 99 CV 2121-B (AJB), bring motions to dismiss, transfer, or stay their respective cases pursuant to the “first-to-file” rule. Second, all Defendants in Dumas and Topps in Rodriquez bring motions to transfer venue of, or, in the alternative, to stay, these actions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404 (a). Finally, Plaintiffs bring a Motion to Consolidate the above-referenced cases with Schwartz v. Upper Deck, 96 CV 3408-B (AJB), Torres v. Pacific Trading Cards, Inc., 97 CV 1658-B (AJB), and Dumas v. Pinnacle Brands, Inc., 98 CV 1509-B (AJB).

II. Background

Plaintiffs have filed cases against various Manufacturers of trading cards and the Licensors of the supporting intellectual…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.