Carter

Carter v. Novartis Consumer Health, Inc.

Good Law
582 F. Supp. 2d 1271·2008 WL 4694585·2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 89244
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 5, 2008EDCV08-0334 MRP (JCRx), EDCV08-1817 MRP (JCRx), EDCV08-2574 MRP (JCRx), EDCV08-3023 MRP (JCRx)California8,464 words

Opinion

Opinion

Pfaelzer, J.

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

Carter v. Novartis Consumer Health, Inc. , CV 08-0334 MRP (JCRx), is one of four substantially identical cases before this court, along with Ostergard v. Wyeth, CV 08-1817 MRP (JCRx); Ostergard v. Adams Respiratory Therapeutics, Inc., et al, CV 08-2574 MRP (JCRx); and Kotler v. Johnson & Johnson, CV 08-3023 MRP (JCRx). Defendants move to dismiss the each of these four cases pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) on the grounds of express and implied preemption. In addition, Defendants move to dismiss Plaintiffs’ consumer fraud claims for failure to satisfy the requirements of Fed.R.Civ.P. 9(b).

I. BACKGROUND

A. Regulation of OTC Cough & Cold Medicine

Over-the-counter (“OTC”) cough and cold medicines are governed by a set of Food & Drug Administration (“FDA”) regulations, called a monograph. See 21 C.F.R. § 330.1 ; Mem. P. & A. Supp. Defs.’ Mot. to Dismiss Pl.’s Compl. (“Defs.’ Mot.”) at 5-7. The monograph for OTC cough and cold medicines (the “OTC monograph”) was promulgated by the FDA based on a process that involved the recommendation of an advisory panel of independent experts, which evaluated the safety and effectiveness of OTC…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.