Behrazfar

Behrazfar v. Unisys Corp.

Good Law
687 F. Supp. 2d 999·2009 WL 5064323·2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 123141
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 15, 2009Case SACV 08-0850 AG (RCx)California2,287 words

Opinion

Opinion

Guilford, J.

AMENDED ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR REMAND

This is a class action concerning allegations that Defendant Unisys Corporation (“Defendant”) violated California’s wage and hour laws. Plaintiff Elaheh Behrazfar (“Plaintiff’) originally brought this case in state court, but Defendant removed it to federal court. Plaintiff filed this motion to remand the case to state court (“Motion”). After reviewing all papers and arguments submitted, the Court DENIES the Motion. BACKGROUND

This Motion concerns the amount in controversy in this case and other procedural issues, so a detailed explanation of the Complaint’s allegations is unnecessary. For now, it is sufficient to state that Plaintiff asserts seven wage and hour claims against Defendant. (Compl. ¶ 1.)

Plaintiff seeks to represent a class of Defendant’s employees comprised of two subclasses. The first subclass is “[a]ll persons employed by [Defendant] in California, at any time during the four-year class period preceding the filing of this action through the date notice is mailed to the class,” who meet certain other criteria. (Compl. ¶ 11.) The second subclass is “[a]ll persons employed by [Defendant] in California, who [meet certain…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.