Young

Young v. City of Visalia

Good Law
687 F. Supp. 2d 1155·2010 WL 289282·2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3237
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 15, 20101:09-cr-00115California7,036 words

Opinion

Opinion

Ishii, J.

ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS

This is a civil rights case brought by Plaintiffs Thad Young and Sandra Young against 23 defendants. On August 18, 2009, the Court dismissed the original complaint. See Court’s Docket Doc. No. 54. On August 28, 2009, Plaintiffs filed a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). The City of Visalia (“the City”), along with 14 individual Visalia police officers (the “Visalia Officers”), have filed a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss. The motion will be granted in part.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

As alleged in the complaint, on November 29, 2007, Defendant Nathan Flaws of the Visalia Police Department obtained a search warrant for property owned and occupied by Plaintiffs. The search warrant application identified the property as having multiple structures and an address of 29022 Road 164. The application did not include a description of a separate, adjacent property parcel. The separate, adjacent property was known locally as the “Old Grange Hall” and had its own separate address, 29006 Road 164, prominently printed on the side of its mailbox. A wooden fence ran along most of the boundary between the “Old Grange Hall” and 29022 Road 164, and other physical…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.