Kittok

Kittok v. Leslie's Poolmart, Inc.

Good Law
687 F. Supp. 2d 953·2009 WL 2855878·2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82316
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 4, 2009Case No. EDCV 08-832 (OPx)California5,091 words

Opinion

Opinion

Larson, J.

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES

On July 6, 2009, the Court granted partial summary judgment in favor of plaintiff Mary Jo Kittok (“plaintiff’ or “Kittok”) on one of her disability access claims brought against defendant Leslie’s Poolmart, Inc. (“defendant” or “Leslie’s”), and dismissed her other claims. Plaintiff now brings the instant motion for attorneys’ fees, as authorized by Cal. Civil Code § 54.3 . The Court held a hearing on the motion on August 10, 2009.

For the reasons set forth below and consistent with the modification described, the motion is GRANTED.

I. BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs complaint included claims brought under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12181 (“the ADA”), California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act, Cal. Civ.Code §§ 51-53 (“the Unruh Act”), the California Disabled Persons Act, Cal. Civ.Code §§ 54-54.8 (“the DPA”), and for negligence under California common law, in response to an incident involving a non-accessible handicap parking space.

Kittok uses a wheelchair for mobility. In July, 2007, she visited a Leslie’s Pool-mart store in Riverside, owned and operated by defendant. The store has one…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.