Atmel Corp. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance

Good Law
421 F. Supp. 2d 1265·2006 WL 708944·2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38419
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 21, 2006C 04-04082 SICalifornia4,132 words

Opinion

Opinion

Illston, J.

ORDER DENYING IN PART AND GRANTING IN PART ST. PAUL’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT RE: BAD FAITH AND PUNITIVE DAMAGES

On March 17, 2006, the Court heard oral argument on defendant St. Paul’s motion for partial summary judgment re: bad faith and punitive damages. After careful consideration of the parties’ papers and the arguments of counsel, the Court DENIES IN PART and GRANTS IN PART St. Paul’s motion for partial summary judgment regarding bad faith and punitive damages.

LEGAL STANDARD

Summary adjudication is proper when “the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c). In a motion for summary judgment, “[if] the moving party for summary judgment meets its initial burden of identifying for the court those portions of the materials on file that it believes demonstrate the absence of any genuine issues of material fact, the burden of production then shifts so that the non-moving party must set forth, by affidavit or as otherwise provided in Rule 56, specific…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.