Graeber

Graeber v. Hewlett Packard Co. Employee Benefits Organization Income Protection Plan

Good Law
421 F. Supp. 2d 1246·2006 WL 709049·2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16145
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 16, 2006C 05-01124 CRBCalifornia4,841 words

Opinion

Opinion

Breyer, J.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This ERISA lawsuit challenges the termination of plaintiffs long-term disability benefits.

BACKGROUND

A. The ERISA Plan

This is a dispute about coverage under the Agilent Technologies, Inc. Disability Plan (“the Plan”). The Plan provides that

Plan § 8(a), Administrative Record (“AR”) at 25. The Plan, in turn, gives the Claims Administrator discretion in reviewing denied claims:

Id. § 8(c)(iii), AR at 26.

The Plan provides benefits to Plan Members who become “Totally Disabled” as follows:

Id. § 2(s), AR at 8 (emphasis added). Thus, after one year of disability the Plan Member may receive benefits only if he cannot perform any occupation, not just his own occupation. Totally disabled includes disability resulting from a mental disorder only if the employee is confined to a hospital for a prolonged period of time. Id. § 2(s)(A), AR at 9. Benefits cease whenever the Claims Administrator determines that the employee is no longer Totally Disabled. Id. § 5(c)(1), AR at 15.

The Plan also provides for “Transitional Return to Work” during the first year (the first 52-week period). The Member may return to work at Agilent or one of its subsidiaries on a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.