Jack D. Matheson v. George Armbrust

Good Law
284 F.2d 670
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 28, 196019750California2,347 words

Opinion

Opinion

284 F.2d 670 Jack D. MATHESON, Appellant, v. George ARMBRUST, Appellee. No. 19750. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. Nov. 28, 1960. Reinhardt, Coblens & Stoll, Justin N. Reinhardt, Morris J. Galen, Portland, Or., for appellant. William F. White, White, Sutherland & White, Portland, Or., for appellee. Before CHAMBERS and HAMLEY, Circuit Judges, and BOWEN, District Judge. HAMLEY, Circuit Judge. 1 George Armbrust, purchaser of one hundred shares of the capital stock of Willamette Hauling Company, brought this action to cancel the contract of sale as void and to recover damages. Named as defendants in addition to the company were Jack D. Matheson, Who sold the stock to Armbrust, and other persons since dismissed from the action. After a nonjury trial judgment was entered for plaintiff, the monetary award being in the sum of $30,000. Appealing to this court, Matheson contends that the district court was without jurisdiction over the subject matter or the person, and that appellee failed to state or prove a claim upon which relief may be granted. 2 The relevant facts as found by the trial court and not disputed here may be briefly stated. Matheson, a resident of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.