Medrano

Medrano v. D'Arrigo Bros. Co. of California

Good Law
336 F. Supp. 2d 1053·2004 WL 2165917·9 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1830·2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19114
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 22, 2004C 00-20826 JF(RS)California3,723 words

Opinion

Opinion

Fogel, J.

AMENDED ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT’S LIABILITY

Plaintiffs move for partial summary judgment as to the liability of Defendant in this class action lawsuit. The Court has read and considered the briefing and evidence submitted by the parties and has considered the oral arguments of counsel. For the reasons set forth below, the motion will be granted.

I. BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs, current and former employees of Defendant D’Arrigo Brothers Company of California (“D’Arrigo”), are agricultural workers. D’Arrigo is engaged in the business of planting, harvesting, grading, packaging, packing, and processing vegetables. Plaintiffs allege that between 1996 and 2000, D’Arrigo neither recorded nor compensated- them for all hours worked — in particular, hours that D’Arrigo required Plaintiffs to spend waiting and traveling to and from fields pursuant to D’Arrigo’s mandatory work transportation policy. Pursuant to this policy, D’Arrigo required Plaintiffs to report to a designated departure point — the Spreckels Parking Lot— and to board buses operated by D’Arrigo. The buses then transported the workers to various work sites. Plaintiffs were…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.