Dotson

Dotson v. Scribner

Good Law
619 F. Supp. 2d 866·2008 WL 4601440·2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81780
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 10, 2008EDCV 06-1389-PA (AGR)California6,012 words

Opinion

Opinion

Anderson, J.

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 , the Court has reviewed the entire file de novo, including the Petition, the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, the Objections to the Report and Recommendation, and all records in the file. Having made a de novo determination, the Court agrees with the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissed this action with prejudice.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The Court submits this Report and Recommendation to the Honorable Percy Anderson, United States District Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and General Order No. 05-07 of the United States District Court for the Central District of Cali forma. For the reasons set forth below, the Magistrate Judge recommends the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be denied.

I.

SUMMARY OF PROCEEDINGS

On March 11, 2003, a San Bernardino County jury convicted Petitioner of petty theft, home invasion robbery, residential burglary, elder abuse, theft from elder, and the unlawful taking of a vehicle; the jury also found true that Petitioner used a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.