Hemphill

Hemphill v. Estate of Ryskamp

Caution
619 F. Supp. 2d 954·2008 WL 789894·44 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1530·2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22528
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 21, 2008CV-F-05-1319 OWW/SMSCalifornia9,247 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wanger, J.

MEMORANDUM DECISION GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION (Doc. 65)

On October 18, 2005, Plaintiff Trudy G. Hemphill filed a Complaint in this court and proceeds under a Second Amended Complaint (SAC) against the Personal Representative of the Estate of James J. Ryskamp, Jr. (Ryskamp Estate); Ryskamp Inc.; Ryskamp Plan; James J. Ryskamp, Jr., M.D., Inc. Money Purchase Pension Plan (“Ryskamp MP Plan”); James J. Ryskamp, Jr., M.D., Inc. Profit Sharing Plan (“Ryskamp PS Plan”), and Judith Dickison Ryskamp, individually and as Trustee of the James J. Ryskamp, Jr. and Judith Dickison Ryskamp Living Trust (“Ryskamp Trust”). The SAC alleges in pertinent part:

Plaintiff moves for summary adjudication in her favor on the First Claim for Relief for declaratory relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2201 and 29 U.S.C. § 1132 (a)(3), the Second Claim for Relief for benefits, to enforce her rights and clarify her rights pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1132 (a)(1)(B), and the Fourth Claim for Relief for injunctive relief and nondisclosure penalties pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1132 (c)(1). Specifically, by this motion Plaintiff seeks the following relief: (1) compel the James J. Ryskamp, Jr.,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.