Shewry

Cleanmaster Industries, Inc. v. Shewry

Good Law
491 F. Supp. 2d 937·2007 WL 1641138·2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41473
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 4, 2007CV 06-2539 FMC (RZx)California5,780 words

Opinion

Opinion

Cooper, J.

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

This matter is before the Court on the Motion for Summary Judgment of Plaintiff Cleanmaster Industries Inc., dba Prescriptions Plus (Cleanmaster Industries), filed on October 3, 2006 (docket no. 27). The Court has read and considered the moving, opposition, and reply documents submitted in connection with this Motion, as well as the papers submitted in response to the Court’s November 15, 2006, Order Requesting Further Briefing. The matter was heard on November 11, 2006, at which time the parties were in receipt of the Court’s November 8, 2006, Tentative Order. For the reasons and in the manner set forth below, the Court hereby GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Plaintiff Cleanmaster Industries operates a “closed door” pharmacy. (Def.’s Statement of Genuine Issues in Opp’n to Pl.’s Statement of Uncontrovert-ed Facts (Opp’n Statement) ¶ l. ) It delivers filled prescriptions to over 1,500 patients, many of whom are homebound. (Decl. of Joseph Kahan in Support of Application for TRO (Kahan Decl.) ¶ 4.) It participates…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.