Quintana

Quintana v. Lundgren

Good Law
368 F. Supp. 2d 1056·2005 WL 950550
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 11, 2005CV 04-9849 SJO(E)California1,382 words

Opinion

Opinion

Otero, J.

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 , the Court has reviewed the Petition, all of the rec ords herein and the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. The Court approves and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation.

IT IS ORDERED that Judgment' be entered denying and dismissing the Petition without prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order, the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation and the Judgment herein by United States mail on Petitioner and counsel for Respondents.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

This Report and Recommendation is submitted to the Honorable S. James Otero, United States District Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 636 and General Order 01-13 of the United States District Court for the Central District of California.

PROCEEDINGS

Petitioner, a federal prisoner in Florida, filed a “Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus By a Person in State Custody 28 U.S.C. § 2254” (“the Petition”) on December 3, 2004. On the same date, Petitioner…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.