Perez-Encinas

Perez-Encinas v. Amerus Life Insurance

Good Law
468 F. Supp. 2d 1127·2006 WL 2092044·2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55411
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 26, 2006C 05-05112 CRBCalifornia5,732 words

Opinion

Opinion

Breyer, J.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Plaintiffs Janet Perez-Encinas and Wendy Perez filed this action against defendant AmerUs Life Insurance Company, formerly known as Central Life Assurance Company, for breach of contract and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. Plaintiffs claim that defendant improperly made payments to their estranged father that should have been sent to them under an annuity policy. Now pending before the Court is defendant’s motion for summary judgment on the grounds that the claims are time barred and that defendant made the annuity payments in accordance with the terms of the policy. After carefully considering the parties’ memoranda and supporting exhibits, and with the benefit of oral argument, defendant’s motion is hereby GRANTED.

BACKGROUND

In 1988, attorney Gene A. Cain and his son, attorney Stephen A. Cain, settled a wrongful death lawsuit regarding plaintiffs’ mother. First Am. Compl., ¶¶ 10, 15. Cain used a part of the settlement to purchase an annuity for various members of the Perez family. Id. at ¶ 12-13. At the time of this transaction, Perez-Encinas was 12 years old and Wendy Perez was 9. Id. at ¶ 10.

According to Gene Cain, he…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.