Arnett

Arnett v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance

Good Law
558 F. Supp. 2d 975·2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 97441
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 10, 2007Case CV 05-01527 DDP (SHx)California2,703 words

Opinion

Opinion

Pregerson, J.

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES

This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs motion for attorneys’ fees. After reviewing and considering the materials submitted herein, the Court grants the motion and adopts the following order.

I. BACKGROUND

A. Plaintiffs Injuñes and, The Denial of Benefits

On November 11, 1997, Officer Arnett sustained injuries while on duty when his patrol car broadsided another ear at ap proximately fifty (50) miles an hour. Between 1997 and 2001 Officer Arnett was examined and treated by a number of physicians who ultimately determined that he had disabilities that prevented him from returning to full duties as a police officer. During this time, unable to fully perform duties required of a police officer, Officer Arnett began working as a police academy instructor.

On April 15, 2001, Officer Arnett, who was no longer working in any capacity, submitted a claim for long term disability benefits to Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company (“Hartford”). The Physical Capabilities Evaluation form prepared by Dr. Stokes that accompanied the claim stated that Officer Arnett could only sit, stand, walk and drive for forty-five (45)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.