Bovarie

Bovarie v. Giurbino

Good Law
558 F. Supp. 2d 1030·2008 WL 927890·2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27892
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 3, 2008CV 05-538-PA (PLA)California9,291 words

Opinion

Opinion

Anderson, J.

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 , the Court has reviewed the entire file de novo, including the magistrate judge’s final report and recommendation, and the objections to the report and recommendation that have been filed herein. The Court agrees with the recommendations of the magistrate judge.

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED:

1. The final report and recommendation is adopted.

2. Judgment shall be entered consistent with this order.

3. The clerk shall serve this order and the judgment on all counsel or parties of record.

FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

This Final Report and Recommendation is submitted to the Honorable Percy Anderson, United States District Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and General Order 194 of the United States District Court for the Central District of California. For the reasons discussed below, the Magistrate Judge recommends that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be dismissed with prejudice.

I

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On September 6, 2001, following a court trial in the Ventura County Superior Court, petitioner was convicted of seven counts of second degree…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.