Hartley Pen Company v. United States District Court

Good Law
287 F.2d 324·129 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 152·4 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 630·1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 5344
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 10, 196117096California4,745 words

Opinion

Opinion

287 F.2d 324 HARTLEY PEN COMPANY, a California corporation, dba the Hartley Company, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, CENTRAL DIVISION, Respondent, The Honorable Benjamin Harrison, Respondent, E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Company, etc., Respondent, and Formulabs, Inc., etc., Respondent. No. 17096. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. February 10, 1961. Owen A. Bartlett, A. V. Falcone, Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner. Lawler, Felix & Hall, John M. Hall, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent, du Pont. William D. Sellers, Pasadena, Cal., for respondent, Formulabs, Inc. Before STEPHENS, BARNES and JERTBERG, Circuit Judges. JERTBERG, Circuit Judge. 1 We granted leave to Hartley Pen Company [petitioner herein] to file its petition for writ of prohibition and for writ of mandate, either or both in the alternative, and for other relief, and issued an order to show cause directed to the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, Central Division, certain Judges of that Court, E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Company, and Formulabs, Inc., respondents. At the hearing on the order to show cause, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.