General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corporation Ltd., a Corporation v. Continental Casualty Company, a Corporation

Good Law
287 F.2d 464·1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 5210
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 27, 196116863_1California2,462 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hamley, J.

Continental Casualty Company, having paid sums and incurred expenses in settling a liability claim against its insured, Brooks-Scanlon, Inc., brought this action against General Accident Fii-e & Life Assurance Corporation, Ltd. Continental sought full reimbursement as subrogee of Brooks-Scanlon’s alleged rights under a policy issued by General to The Austin Company. In the alternative, Continental sought pro rata reimbursement according to the bodily injury limits of their respective policies. Jurisdiction in the district court rests on diversity of citizenship.

Judgment was entered for Continental in the sum of $23,416.10. This represents an eight-thirteenths pro rata reimbursement of $30,000 paid in settlement of the claim, a like reimbursement of $1,444.56 incurred for attorneys’ fees and other expenses in settling the claim, and $3,500 as attorneys’ fees for prosecuting the instant action. General appeals. Continental has not cross-appealed but has requested this court to allow an additional $3,000 as attorneys’ fees on this appeal.

The facts are not in dispute. On March 27, 1956, Continental issued a policy of liability insurance to Brooks-Scanlon, Inc. This company was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.