BRETTELLE

Brettelle v. Life Insurance Co. of North America

Good Law
691 F. Supp. 2d 1249·2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25275
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 8, 2010Case 09cv534 JM(WMc)California2,677 words

Opinion

Opinion

Miller, J.

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT; DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR JUDGMENT

Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 52, Plaintiff Silena Brettelle moves for entry of judgment on her ERISA claim for plan benefits. Defendants Life Insurance Company of North America (“LINA”) and Science Applications International Employee Welfare Benefit Plan (the “Plan”) oppose the motion and cross-move for judgment in their favor on the ground that “no accident” occurred and therefore there is no liability under the accidental death policy. For the reasons set forth below, the court concludes that the death of Ms. Brettelle’s husband was the result of an “accident” covered under the policy. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is instructed to enter judgment in favor of Ms. Brettelle and against Defendants in the amount of the policy, $250,000.

BACKGROUND

On March 17, 2009 Plaintiff commenced this action by filing a complaint for relief under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. Plaintiff seeks to recover the $250,000 death benefit under Group Accident Policy No. OK819515 (the “Policy”) issued by LINA to Ms. Brettelle’s employer, Science Applications…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.