Clement v. California Department of Corrections

Good Law
220 F. Supp. 2d 1098·2002 WL 31050915·2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17426
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 9, 2002C 00-1860 CWCalifornia8,019 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wilken, J.

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION; GRANTING PLAINTIFF PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT.

Defendant California Department of Corrections (CDC) and the named Defendant employees of the CDC (Individual Defendants) move for summary judgment on Plaintiff Frank Clement’s section 1983 claims for damages and injunctive relief. Plaintiff opposes the motion and moves for preliminary injunctive relief with respect to one of his claims. Defendants oppose Plaintiffs request for a preliminary injunction. The matter was heard on August 9, 2002. Having considered all of the papers filed by the parties and oral argument on the motion, the Court grants in part and denies in part Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Docket # 31), denies Plaintiffs request for a preliminary injunction (Docket # 53), and grants partial summary judgment to Plaintiff.

BACKGROUND

At all times relevant to this motion, Plaintiff was a prisoner at Pelican Bay State Prison (Pelican Bay).

A. Delay in Diagnosis and Treatment for Colon Cancer

On April 8, 1999, Plaintiff advised a nurse that he had been experiencing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.