Jevne

Jevne v. Superior Court

Good Law
2005 Cal. LEXIS 5610·2005 Daily Journal DAR 5965·28 Cal. Rptr. 3d 685·35 Cal. 4th 935·111 P.3d 954
Supreme Court of CaliforniaMay 23, 2005S121532California10,196 words

Opinion

Opinion

Kennard, J.

In 2001, the California Legislature enacted Code of Civil Procedure section 1281.85, subdivision (a) (hereafter section 1281.85(a)), which directed the California Judicial Council to establish ethics standards for persons serving as neutral arbitrators under contractual arbitration agreements. (Stats. 2001, ch. 362, § 4.) As explained in a legislative report, the Legislature’s purpose was “to provide basic measures of consumer protection with respect to private arbitration, such as minimum ethical standards and remedies for the arbitrator’s failure to comply with existing disclosure requirements.” (Assem. Com. on Judiciary, Analysis of Sen. Bill No. 475 (2001-2002 Reg. Sess.) Aug. 20, 2001, p. 1.)

In response to the Legislature’s directive, the Judicial Council adopted the Ethics Standards for Neutral Arbitrators in Contractual Arbitration (Cal. Rules of Court, appen., div. VI; hereafter the California Standards), most of which became effective on July 1, 2002. The stated purposes of the California Standards are “to guide the conduct of arbitrators, to inform and protect participants in arbitration, and to promote public confidence in the arbitration process.” (Id., std.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.