Garza

People v. Garza

Bad Law
2005 Cal. LEXIS 5382·2005 Daily Journal DAR 5752·28 Cal. Rptr. 3d 335·35 Cal. 4th 866·111 P.3d 310
Supreme Court of CaliforniaMay 19, 2005S120551California5,622 words

Opinion

Opinion

Kennard, J.

This case involves the interplay between two criminal law statutes: one a provision of the Penal Code, the other a provision of the Vehicle Code.

Subdivision (a) of Penal Code section 496 (hereafter section 496(a)) defines the crime of receiving stolen property. It also provides that a person who has been convicted of the theft of property may not also be convicted of receiving the same property. This provision codifies a common law rule prohibiting separate convictions of the same person for stealing and receiving the same property. (People v. Allen (1999) 21 Cal.4th 846, 857 [ 89 Cal.Rptr.2d 279 , 984 P.2d 486 ] (Allen).)

Subdivision (a) of Vehicle Code section 10851 (hereafter section 10851(a)), defines the crime of unlawful driving or taking of a vehicle. Unlawfully taking a vehicle with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of possession is a form of theft, and the taking may be accomplished by driving the vehicle away. For this reason, a defendant convicted under section 10851(a) of unlawfully taking a vehicle with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of possession has suffered a theft conviction and may not also be convicted under section 496(a) of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.