Shively

Shively v. Bozanich

Good Law
31 Cal. 4th 1230·7 Cal. Rptr. 3d 576·80 P.3d 676
Supreme Court of CaliforniaDecember 22, 2003S094467California8,222 words

Opinion

Opinion

George, J.

In this case we consider the application of the statute of limitations to a defamation case in which plaintiff first learned that she had been defamed after purchasing and reading a book that contained defamatory remarks about her, remarks that were attributed to persons other than the author of the book.

Ordinarily, a tort cause of action accrues and the limitations period commences when the injury occurs; for defamation this occurs, generally speaking, when the defendant communicates the defamatory statement to others. In some tort actions, the accrual of the cause of action is delayed until the plaintiff knew (or with reasonable diligence should have known) of the factual basis for the claim. This so-called discovery rule has been applied to defamation actions in limited circumstances when the defamatory statement is made in secret or is inherently undiscoverable. The question before us is whether the discovery rule may be employed to delay the accrual of a cause of action for defamation beyond the point at which the defamation no longer is secret but was made public in a book.

In the present case, plaintiff alleged that the same defamatory statement was communicated…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.