Paxton

Paxton v. City of Montebello

Good Law
712 F. Supp. 2d 1007·2010 WL 1255915·2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36931
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 18, 2010Case CV 09-3691-RCCalifornia5,918 words

Opinion

Opinion

Chapman, J.

PROCEEDINGS: (1) ORDER GRANTING, IN PART, AND DENYING, IN PART, PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; AND (2) ORDER GRANTING, IN PART, AND DENYING, IN PART, DEFENDANT’S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

On February 17, 2010, plaintiffs filed a notice of motion and motion for summary judgment or, in the alternative, partial summary judgment, a supporting memorandum of points and authorities, a separate statement of uncontroverted facts, and several supporting declarations, and defendant City of Montebello (“City”) filed a notice of motion and motion for summary judgment or, in the alternative, partial summary judgment, a supporting memorandum of points and authorities, a separate statement of uncontroverted facts, and supporting declarations. On February 24, 2010, defendant City filed an opposition to plaintiffs’ summary judgment motion and evidentiary objections to the declarations of plaintiffs and their counsel, and plaintiffs filed an opposition to defendant City’s summary judgment motion and opposing declarations. On March 3, 2010, the parties filed their replies, both sides filed supplemental declarations, and defendant City filed additional evidentiary objections to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.