Sinadinos

Natomas Gardens Investment Group, LLC v. Sinadinos

Good Law
710 F. Supp. 2d 1008·2010 WL 1659970
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 23, 2010Civ. S-08-2308 FCD/KJMCalifornia7,655 words

Opinion

Opinion

Damrell, J.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter is before the court on defendants’ various motions to dismiss and motions for a more definite statement with regards to plaintiffs Natomas Garden Investment Group, LLC and Orchard Park Development, LLC’s (collectively, “plaintiffs”) second amended complaint (“SAC”). (Docket’s 128, 134, 139.) Plaintiffs oppose the motions. For the reasons set forth below, defendants’ motions are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.

BACKGROUND

This case arose out of a failed business venture between Eric Solorio (“Solorio”) and defendants John Sinadinos (“Sinadinos”), Larry Deane (“Deane”), and their various alleged co-conspirators. Beginning in 2003, Solorio negotiated to obtain rights to purchase undeveloped real property from several property owners in the Sacramento area. (SAC ¶ 44.) Solorio endeavored to subsequently develop and sell this land, for which he formed a limited liability company, plaintiff Natomas Gardens Investment Group, LLC (“Natomas”). (Id. at ¶¶ 44-45.) In seeking financing for his potential project, Solorio met defendants Deane and Sinadinos. (Id. at ¶ 46.) Sinadinos, an attorney who had some involvement in land development in the Sacramento…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.