Sunkist Growers, Inc. v. Winckler & Smith Citrus Products Co.

Good Law
289 F.2d 933·1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 4598
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 5, 196115242California230 words

Opinion

Opinion

289 F.2d 933 SUNKIST GROWERS, INC., a Corporation, and the Exchange Orange Products Company, a Corporation, Appellants, v. WINCKLER & SMITH CITRUS PRODUCTS CO., a Corporation, and Ronald Walker, Trustee, Appellees. No. 15242. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. May 5, 1961. On Petitions for Rehearing. For former opinion, see 284 F.2d 1 . Before STEPHENS, BARNES and MERRILL, Circuit Judges. 1 Upon petitions for rehearing by both appellants and appellees, we modify the opinion heretofore filed as follows: 2 I. The balance of the first full sentence after the word "or", page 24, line 4, of slip opinion [ 284 F.2d 17 ], is stricken, and inserted in its place is the following: 3 "* * * (2) the alleged illegal sole trader decision not to sell, made when such refusal would, as a natural consequence, illegally restrain trade or commerce, and implemented by other illegal means beyond the bare refusal, or (3) a similar unilateral decision not to sell, except at a fixed price, made from a monopoly position, and resulting, as a natural consequence, in the elimination of a competitor." 4 II. On page 50, line 18 from top of slip opinion [ 284 F.2d 33 ], the language "and a sale on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.