Vasquez

United States v. Vasquez

Good Law
706 F. Supp. 2d 1015·2010 WL 1539758·2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47208
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 29, 2010CR 09-693 SVWCalifornia7,455 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wilson, J.

AMENDED ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO SUPPRESS; FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW [63]

I. INTRODUCTION AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On July 21, 2009, the United States (“Plaintiff’ or the “United States”) filed an eight-count criminal indictment against Defendants Erasmo Vasquez Vasquez (“Vasquez”), Eusebio Mantanic Chavez (“Chavez”), and Tomasa Macaría Ajpop (“Ajpop”). Count one charges Defendants for conspiracy under 8 U.S.C. § 1324 (a)(l)(A)(v)(I). Counts two through eight charge Defendants with harboring and concealing seven illegal aliens for private financial gain, under 8 U.S.C. §§ 1324 (a)(1)(A)(iii), (a)(l)(B)(i).

On November 2, 2009, Vasquez filed a motion seeking to suppress all evidence derived from the warrantless entry and search of the residence at 36540 Clear-wood Court, Palmdale, California, 93550 (“the Clearwood Court residence”) on July 8, 2009. Vasquez also sought to suppress all evidence seized during a search of the Clearwood Court residence on July 9, 2009, conducted pursuant to a warrant. Vasquez contends that: (1) the initial war rantless entry and search of the Clearwood Court residence was without probable cause and no exigent circumstances…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.