Zepeda

Zepeda v. Uribe

Good Law

710 F. Supp. 2d 1024·2010 WL 1734957·2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41137

United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 27, 2010Case 09 CV 1811 JM (WVG)California4,053 words

Opinion

Miller, J.

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS

On February 2, 2010, Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo entered a Report and Recommendation. (Doc. No. 15). The Report and Recommendation, expressly incorporated herein, thoroughly and thoughtfully analyzed Petitioner’s claims and recommended that Petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. No. 1) be granted. Respondent filed an objection and Petitioner filed a reply. (Doc. Nos. 17, 19). Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(d)(1), this matter is appropriate for decision without oral argument.

In his objections, Respondent sets forth essentially the same arguments raised in his response to the original petition. As the Report and Recommendation fully and properly responds to these arguments, the court hereby adopts the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. Petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION GRANTING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

Petitioner Arnulfo Zepeda (hereafter “Petitioner”) has filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (hereafter “Petition”). Respondent Domingo Uribe…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.